[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Version 2000.2



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This approach looks nice in absolute but looking at the state of our
democracy right now , It appears to me that this will result in an extension
of the posts for politicians backdoor entry on various important posts.
Don't we already have the chairmen of various boards and cooperative
organizations , getting posted in almost the same way ? and aren't these
provisions being abused by politicians ? Unless there is some way to ensure
that elected executive does it's duty well this could be a disaster. Today
the civil servants might be corrupt but they are not goonda at least. I feel
this provision will make way for the criminals to enter even on civil
servant posts because of their "entrepreneurial" skills and become a way to
reward those who help politicians to come to power.
Krishna

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-india_policy@cinenet.net
[mailto:owner-india_policy@cinenet.net]On Behalf Of Dr. Sanjeev Sabhlok
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 11:46 AM
To: debate@indiapolicy.org
Subject: Version 2000.2


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on Umesh's excellent points below, I have added the following under

8.	Administrative Reforms

e)	All these administrative positions would be filled by nomination of the
person by the elected executive and subsequent screening and confirmation
hearing and approval by the Lok Sabha or related State Assemblies.

Version 2000.2 is now up.

At 06:55 PM 01/12/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>http://www.indiapolicy.org/lists/india_policy/2000/Jan/msg00010.html
>
>Forgive me folks for joining late in this debate. If my two cents worth
>means anything then I say we don't need IAS Academies or a separate class
of
>IAS officials. We certainly could and should have very high and strict
>standards of educational, as well as relevant experience in industry and/or
>academic background for the positions of public offices to run bureaucracy
>such as Secretaries of various departments reporting to individual
>ministries. All of these administrative positions should have a limited
term
>and must be filled by
>
>1. Nomination of the person by the elected executive (such as the prime
>minister or chief minister depending upon the jurisdiction) and
>2. Subsequent screening and confirmation hearing and approval by the Lok
>Sabha or related State Assemblies.
>
>All of bright and young individuals aspiring to join civil service should
>study hard, hone their skills as able administrators by proving to be
>successful Academicians/Entrepreneurs and then look for the opportunity for
>an elected executive to pick them up and again have the courage to face
>intense public scrutiny and confirmation process from the
>parliament/assembly of elected representatives.
>
>In my humble opinion this is the only way to return power to the people,
the
>ordinary citizens to govern themselves. That's what IAS strives to achieve
>but totally the wrong way.
>
>In my approach, there may not be too many jobs of IAS or other civil
>servants, but instead, these bright young people will work towards
>generating wealth for the country and for themselves as entrepreneurs while
>opting temporarily to join as civil servants to serve individual elected
>governments rather then sitting permanently on government payrolls as
>parasites (for lack of better word, forgive my choice of no so nice a
word!)
>no matter whether so many civil servants are needed or not.
>
>Hope this provides some helpful input, otherwise please ignore my message.
I
>don't claim to know a lot in this field.
>
>Umesh Tiwari
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
>Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------