RE: Critique of Dasgupta's description

["Asher, Mukul Govindji" <ecsasher@nus.edu.sg>]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
[Topics under debate]: GOOD GOVERNANCE
___Help make this manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!___
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Prof Roy

I agree with your sentiments. Use of language should always be such that

doors on compromise and cooperation as well as for competition are not
shut.

I also agree with your concern about the need for civil defense
awareness
and preparedness.

Sincerely

Mukul Asher

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Subroto Roy [mailto:sroy@vgsom.iitkgp.ernet.in]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 9:48 PM
To: debate@indiapolicy.org
Subject: Critique of Dasgupta's description


---------------------------------------------------------------------
[Topics under debate]: GOOD GOVERNANCE
___Help make this manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!___
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 this poisonous insect of a nation

The above is not a civil way for an Indian to describe Pakistan, even
though
we may be enemies in war shortly.   It places us at the same level of
those
in Pakistan who use similar terms to describe us.    There is good and
evil
in Pakistan as there is everywhere else.  The problem at the moment is
that
the evil seem to have the upper hand.

Subroto Roy.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------