[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: India conducts Nuclear Tests....


You mirror my views on this. In response to your question on why the USA
still wants to carry on with its stockpile, please visit (some of these
might be outdated: please let me know of other web sites that discuss
India's defence):









I would like Murthy to respond to Charu's comments, if possible [also,
please join this list: your joining is long overdue]. 



On Mon, 11 May 1998, Charudatt wrote:
> Parag Bhatt[SMTP:pbhatt@fmi.fujitsu.com] writes:
> 	What do we have to say abou this nuclear test conducted
> by India Today.  Personally, I am very proud of it.  But, 
> something that needs to be thought of, is the consequence
> of such a test in the Internaltion arena.
> -----------------------------Included Message -------------- <deleted>
> IMO...
> The reaction by the presidential spokesman and state dept is the 
> predictable double-speak, and we can expect the same to be
> parrotted by the evening news anchors and CNN. I'll probably miss
> the evening news on account of my schedule, but I wonder if anyone
> will mention that the US satellite of Israel that has a long-standing
> nuclear weapons program and is estimated to have around 200
> nuclear bombs and has conducted tests, several in cooperation with the
> former apartheid regime of South Africa. Documents detailing the
> program were released by a courageous and conscientious engineer
> Mordechai Vanunu- he was jailed and has been kept in solitary
> confinement for over 10 years despite numerous appeals by
> Human rights organizations around the world. If the US wanted to stop
> the Israeli program they could easily do so given that over 30% of
> Israel's government budget consists of US aid.
> I don't think anyone will raise the question as to why the US
> continues to maintain and test nuclear weapons now that the "evil
> godless communists" are gone, certainly not to defend itself against an
> invasion by Canada or Mexico. Likewise no one is likely to ask why the
> US does not object to testing and stockpiling by China, France, or
> Britain.
> I expect that there will be talk of how some "terrorists" or one of the
> demonized states with "lunatic/irrational/fundamentalist" leaders such
> as Libya or Iran could threaten "US interests" if weapons technology
> proliferates though they will probably will not mention that the act
> of a political leader provoking and waging a war of aggression to
> boost his or her political popularity is not the exclusive preserve of
> tin-pot dictators but includes at least three successive US
> presidents- Clinton sent cruise missiles into Baghdad on the story of
> a "plot" on former president Bush's life- at a time his approval poll
> numbers were at a low point. The Gulf war, the invasion of Panama, and
> the invasion of Grenada were similar operations.
> Personally, I think Vajpayee did the wrong thing in giving the tests a
> go ahead. I would like to see ALL nuclear weapons destroyed and
> banned. OTOH, I find the sanctimonious braying of the official US
> organs completely hypocritical.

----- End Included Message -----