[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mr. Ashish should respect....

Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!


Dear Rohit,

"But why should one do good for the people?"

Because, I believe in Nash Equilibrium. If guys still want to live 
in Smithian age, it's their choice (problem in my view).

I dont care what IMHO is or HOMI is or OHMI etc is. But thanks for 
informing me. We should stop kidding ourselves by believing that 
India is just like any other democracy because only the 
acknowledgement of this fact could build a premise from where any 
debate or discussion about the suitability of any political theory 
to Indian context could be initiated. Till then, as you said, it 
would be mere manifestation of ignorance.

It would help the debators here to answer the following 
1. Is India a peculiar democracy?
2. If yes, how?
3. How do these peculiarities interact among themselves and with 
existing socio-econo-political theory that is troubling us?
4. Is there a way out?
5. If yes, then what?
6. What are the economic, social, political implications of the 
chosen theory?
7. Are the costs worth the benefit?
8. If yes, go ahead?
9. If not, then reask question #4?
10. Iterate 4 to 9 till optimum solution is achieved.

It's not as plain as this algorithm, it's just how I view it very 
broadly. I am sure the makers of Indian constitution did their 
homework but I seriously doubt the verasity of data they based 
their theory on. Political experts are welcome to debate this out. 
But bear that there questions should not be answered based on 
whims and fancies but should be substantiated by operational data 
of demography and rational (keyword) assessment of intangible 
information and valid plan for contingencies. That I feel would be 
a robust design of an ideal theory for India. Inputs are 


This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/