[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
Ritu Ko: completely and absolutely well said.

Dr. Roy, realize the difference in principle of what is happening here
what happens in India.  It is not possible for law enforcement agencies
be everywhere at everytime.  The actions of a few morons should not
the fact that the Americans are tolerant people.  The guy who shot the
sardar was caught the same day and charged the next.  He will doubtless
spend a substantial amount of time in jail.  The president and many
important people have asked for tolerance on TV.  He also specifically
mentioned Sikhs.  The government has gone out of its way to make people
aware that this not a time for singling out minorities.  Ordinary people
Christian faith protected mosques by holding vigils outside.
incidents have happened and will continue to happen, here and all over
world. There can be no perfect implementation of the law.  What matters
the integrity of the MAJORITY of the govt and law enforcement officials
the fact that they sincerely are trying to do their best.  Tell me that
can say the same for India.  Injustice is always done by someone
and cannot be avoided.  WHat matters is that justice is done swiftly


--- Ritu Ko <ritu_ko@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vamsi wrote:
> >Oh comon Ritu, admit it....you are one of the few on this forum who
> >always
> >bad mouthing India and Indians with a vicious vengeance....
> Hm, I wonder whether you are getting the same mails that I am posting.

> If
> yes, then I wonder at your inability to process statements and
> information.
> Bad mouthing India and Indians with a vicious vengeance? I might have
> been
> offended, had I not been so amused. How do you define 'bad mouthing
> a
> vicious vengeance'? Surely, an acknowledgement of reality cannot be
> called
> that [at least not by a rational adult, anyway].
> OF course, if the reason I provoke your ire is my refusal to subscribe

> to
> the view that India is all that is good and the US is all that is bad,

> then
> I can't really help it. I left behind the emotional problems and
> assumptions
> of a ten year old the day I turned 11. I would respectfully suggest
> you
> try the same.
> Why don't you substantiate your above description with relevant lines
> taken
> from my mails? I will give you my reasons for each and every statement

> made
> by me. Unlike you, Vamsi, I don't throw empty words in the air.
> I'll be the first to admit that I am extremely critical of Indian
> society
> and polity. I have my reasons, primary among them is the fact that I
> refuse
> to close my eyes to reality and indulge in baseless fantasies [when I
> wish
> to write fiction, I do just that - I don't confuse fiction with fact,
> matter how tempting that might be].
> Also, I am Indian, living in India. I have built a life, a business
> here. I
> pay my taxes, vote in elections and have the right to criticize my
> the
> way I see fit. I will not give up this right for anything, let alone
> the
> sake of sanctimonious idiots who can't stop bleating long enough to
> think.
> I say, often and loudly, that we are in a mess. We are. I say that our

> greatest threat is from us. It is. I say that focussing on the
> of
> others is a waste of time and doesn't do anything constructive for us.

> It is
> true.
> What you fail to understand that this criticism stems from a love for
> country. I fail to see what service I would render my nation by
> patently ridiculous, demonstratably baseless lies [I seem to remember
> somebody in this forum making the statement that India offers the same

> opportunities as the US for individual advancement. Strangely enough,
> that
> certain somebody doesn't even live here]. How can we even think of
> improving
> when we don't have the courage to acknowledge the present messy
> Surely, an acknowledgement of what is has to be the first step in
> change. I
> thought that would be obvious to anybody with a brain. Apparently, I
> guilty of overestimating the sense of some people.
> Another aspect of my criticism stems from an almost chauvinistic pride

> in my
> culture and heritage. I am a student of Indian history and politics,
> have
> been for the past 15 years. I have read our ancient epics and shastras

> [I
> wonder if you have actually read any of the originals] and I am sick
> the
> currently prevailing perverted form of the sanatana dharma. A lot of
> criticism stems from the thought, "Hell! If anybody ought to know
> better, it
> is us!"
> In all your harpings about the cloud of distrust that is settling over

> the
> US today [with regard to Asians and Arabs], did you ever stop to think

> of
> the way we treat our own people? If you had, you would not have made
> such a
> long, gleeful jump to define the entire US as evil. What about what
> happened
> at the funeral of Balbir Singh Sondhi? A highly placed representative
> the
> executive went there and actually declared that this was a cowardly
> of
> murder, not a demonstration of patriotism. Politically motivated?
> Just
> words? Maybe. But this certainly more than Rao did in December 1992 or

> Vajpayee did this month.
> Try giving credit where it is due, it won't subtract anything from
> I have another reason to object to your constant US bashing as well. I

> personally am of the opinion that any individual who avails of the
> benefits
> of a society, country or civilization owes some kind of a loyalty back

> to
> them. I feel this way when people from the north-east don't pay taxes,

> avail
> of the reservations and then refuse to call themselves Indians. I feel

> this
> way when foreign students come here, take benefit of our education
> system
> and never miss an opportunity to run down my country. The principle
> remains
> the same, even when the country being run down is not my own. It is
> called
> consistency.
> >Proud to hear, however, that you know some brave folks who fought for

> >India!
> Not just fought but died fighting too. And guess what? They were all
> capable
> of thought, and felt much the same as I do about the way things are in

> our
> country today. What makes you think that they do not [in some cases,
> not] criticize India? What makes you think that they are happy with
> way
> the country is being run? They risk all, for a miserable pittance, and

> then
> see their gains frittered away by spineless politicians. Do you think
> they
> really subscribe to the view that India is absolutely perfect? Surely,

> even
> you have to be capable of more logic than that. And what do you care
> about
> the Indian Armed Forces anyway? They'd all die soon enough if your
> were consistently applied. For the sake of all that is good and
> precious,
> Vamsi, stop invoking their name and hiding behind them. Some things,
> some
> sacrifices are too big to be profaned for the sake of rhetoric.
> You do not seem to have gained the emotional maturity to realise that
> love
> for one's country doesn't mean closing one's eyes to the problems
> prevalent
> in the same.
> I certainly hope that this clarifies the issues for you somewhat, but
> then
> again, I am not holding my breath.
> Ritu

This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/