[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enron India Problem

Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
If a house is left unlocked(India) and a thief(enron) manages to slip in
steal everything(literally) certainly those idiotic mindless people who
the house unlocked are to blame. Does that mean we mustn't use the
stick we can find and hit the thief out of the house. Does the thief
being one, because he was let in?

There is a lot more than meets the eye as well. Human rights watch has
reports of Enron using private police and state police in some cases(
are on their payroll) to beat up villagers who are there to peacefully
protest against dabhol.

Sounds chillingly similar to a certain company that set up certain
posts in India a few centuries ago, and used force to protect their
"interests" and proceeded to subjugate the country.

Will we never learn?


>From: Padmanabha Rao <kvprao@igidr.ac.in>
>Reply-To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>Subject: Re: Enron India Problem
>Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:46:28 -0800 (PST)
>Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
>On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Gautam Sampath Kumar wrote:
>  On our part our bureaucrats were stupid to agree to this, but we've
>  learnt from our mistakes and this being a country-company contract, I

>  should think that we must proceed to scrap the deal with enron. Or is

>  the company more powerful than the country? When we deal with thieves

>  and then realise we were robbed, any rational person would not think
>  about agreements and honouring them. The Bureaucrats put India in the

>  coffin and those Indians who voice their support for those
>  thieves nail the coffin. I would suggest that some Indians first need

>  get themselves a backbone.
>I think one gets a backbone by displaying responsibility. MSEB SIGNED a

>CONTRACT, voluntarily. Enron did not force it to enter the contract
>against its wishes. If MSEB thinks it was a mistake it has only itself
>blame, not Enron. Why do we miss such simple truths ? If I break a
>contract, and rely on my power to destroy to contain it, then I am
>violent. Period. And violence is not in the least a rational act.
>violence is good, not proactive violence. Did Enron break the contract
>Then certainly destroy it.

This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/