[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mr. Aggarwal, please try to be scientific

Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
>    I sincerely share Dr. Roy's concerns about the projected revenues
>billion dollars.
>    Point No 1: Mr Aggarwal, in an earlier reply said that the figure
>billion dollars is based on the current growth rate of 50%. How can an
>estimate be that simple ? We don't need McKinsey's for that. Can I
>that simple rule to other sectors, say textiles ? No, you cannot. We
>only have to consider the external competition, but our abilities to
>that. Like, the quality of engineers, the management, govt policies and

I never said the current 50% growth rate was projected to last forever
even till 2008.  As I said in an ealier reply, if that were to happen
export target for 2008 would be much greater than $50 billion.  To
the $50 billion target takes into consideration many opportunities and
threats and assumes the growth rate will slow significantly over the
next 8
years. Why don't you read the 12 page Study Highlights for yourself,

>     Point No 2: About the quality of our engineers. Mr. Arun Mehta was

>in this regard. Please do not quote and believe the likes of John
>and Gates. Standing on Indian soil, they can only say that we are
second to

They are not saying we are second to none because they are standing on
Indian soil.  They are standing on Indian soil because they believe we
second to none.  Think about it, India accounts for less than 2% of
revenues.  Why would they visit India in the first place?  Why don't
stand on Pakistani or Malaysian soil and make such statements? When Bill

Gates visited India without visiting Pakistan, the Pakistani newspapers
wrote that this reflected how far India had surpassed Pakistan in IT.
Why do you think the Bill Gates, John Chambers and the like are coming
India in the first place, my friend?

Look at those half-baked students, being churned out by the most
>lucrative industry in India, the engineering colleges. Mr. Agarwal,
look at
>the computer science departments. They have the infrastructure, but no
>faculty. Don't tell me that industry trains them.

This isssue is being addressed. It will take time but their are several
strategies that are being pursued which should address this issue. See
IT Task Force Initiative that I posted earlier.

That takes us to the issue
>of the IT managers
>     I had the misfortune of working for TCS, once upon a time.
The less said about the quality of TCS, the better. What do you expect
a company that doesn't even offer an ESOP.

Believe me,
>it was such a frustrating experience. It is run like a grocery store.
It is
>the case with many companies. You have to be part of that to see how
>it is. Many companies, adhere to quality by completing the paper work
>nothing else. There is so much to write about. Ofcourse, this is not to
>that, we are incapable of some excellent work. We are yet to have
>visionaries and I am only highlighting the current state.
>     About the news that TCS, Wipro and Infosys plan to outsource
>maintenance work to china. How ridiculous ? The US or european
>will then go to china. Why will they have to do it through WIPRO or TCS
>Such talk is devoid of any merit. 'Made in China' is a better brand
>     We succeeded in this out sourcing work because of the low entry
>barriers. That can be our undoing, if we are complacent. Dewang
>Pramod Mahajan's and newspaper articles can only create that feel-good
>factor. It is up to us and the IT cheiftains ( who are over-valued,
>their company stocks ) to change the course of IT industry.
>    We still import avionics and other mission critical software. We
can be
>rightly proud of our IT industry, when we start writing such software.

This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/