[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Can Fundamentalist Islam and Democracy Coexist in a Country? -LA



Times
To: debate@indiapolicy.org
Sender: owner-india_policy@cinenet.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: debate@indiapolicy.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, March 20, 2000
Home Edition
Section: Metro
Page: B-5
http://www.lats.com/

Commentary
Can Fundamentalist Islam and Democracy Coexist in a Country?
No: Nothing could have been more irrelevant to Muhammad than consent of the
governed.
By: AUSAF ALI
Ausaf Ali, a former professor at the Graduate School of Business
Administration of the University of Karachi, is the author of "Broader
Dimensions of the Ideology of Pakistan" (Royal Book Co., Karachi, 1988)

It has been well said that those who do not learn from history are condemned
to repeat it. I offer Pakistan as a case in point. In its 52 years of
history, Pakistan--created on Aug. 14, 1947, out of British India, which
became independent a day later--has been placed under military rule after
the overthrow of the civilian government by the Pakistani army in 1958, 1977
and 1999. Even during civilian rule, the army has called the shots from
behind the elected leaders of Pakistan. While India is the most populous
democracy in the world, Pakistan has miserably failed at any kind of
democracy, including Islamic. It is clear that along with democracy, all the
Islamization programs have failed. Islam and the Sharia, or Islamic law,
simply do not have the conceptual resources, flexibility and dynamism to
suffice for the governance of a modern state and operation of a rational
economy and an expanding civil society.
By now, Pakistanis have developed a sad conviction that democracy as we know
it is just not a workable form of government for their country, because
Pakistanis do not have the social psychology, the political culture, the
social ethics or the common decency for making democracy work.
The difference in the fortunes of democracy in India and Pakistan is that
the world view of Indians is derived from Hinduism and that of Pakistanis
from Islam. Ideologically, Hinduism is quite compatible with secularism,
democracy and democratic values. Islam is hostile toward all three. As the
founder and chief executive of the first Islamic polity at Medina in what is
today Saudi Arabia, Muhammad ruled in accordance with the will of Allah as
revealed to him and translated into his own will. Nothing could have been
more irrelevant to his rule than the consent of the governed. There was no
room for "we the people" or for legislation by elected representatives of
the people because the whole body of laws as laid down in the Sharia was
valid and binding for all times. That is the reason why parliaments in
Muslim countries even today are rubber-stamp bodies. Neither citizens' right
to criticize nor to dissent from their rulers are recognized. Islam
admonishes Muslims to obey Allah, his prophet and those in power, as it
admonishes women to obey men, because "men are a degree above them."
Islam puts women, minorities and nonconformists at a disadvantage. Muslims
do not recognize the idea of diversity in their own countries, though they
take the fullest advantage of it in the West. To be sure, a woman rose to
the position of the prime minister in Pakistan, but this was resented by
fundamentalist Muslim men, because Muhammad prophesied that any nation or
organization with a woman as its leader is headed for disaster. Non-Muslims,
heretics, apostates and homosexuals are regarded as fit for persecution.
Given the attitudes Islam imparts to Muslims, it is apparent why democracy
failed in Pakistan: because fundamentalist Islam and democracy are not
compatible. Once this is realized, an honest search for a suitable form of
political system, even if less satisfactory than democracy, can begin. As a
Pakistani, I find it sad that a people who can master the rules of cricket
should have failed so miserably at learning the rules of democracy, which
are far simpler. So long as Pakistanis insist on applying the uncompromising
demands of fundamentalist Islam, democracy has no chance in Pakistan. Sadly,
democracy seems to be doomed in the foreseeable future in the whole world of
Islam.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------