[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: simplicity



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[from Moderator: this topic is also closed]

By basic I did not mean simple or fundamental.MD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-india_policy@cinenet.net
> [mailto:owner-india_policy@cinenet.net]On Behalf Of Yazad Jal
> Sent: 25 January 2000 00:08
> To: debate@indiapolicy.org
> Subject: simplicity
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> On a point of semantics - is a basic viewpoint useless or non-serious?
> does everything have to be complex in order to be valuable?
> yazad
>
> Maja Daruwala wrote:
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > I agree it is difficult to take seriously the arguements and
> viewpoints of
> > someone whose viewpoint is so basic.
> >
> > Maja Daruwala
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-india_policy@cinenet.net
> > > [mailto:owner-india_policy@cinenet.net]On Behalf Of Asher, Mukul
> > > Govindji
> > > Sent: 14 January 2000 10:32
> > > To: 'debate@indiapolicy.org'
> > > Subject: RE: manifesto
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > It is essential to debate in a civilized manner which does not
> > > degrade those
> > > with different points of view.
> > >
> > > The words use for the socialists should be unacceptable. I hope
> > > this is so.
> > >
> > > Mukul Asher
> > >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From:         acomelo [mailto:acomelo@goplay.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:46 AM
> > > To:   debate@indiapolicy.org
> > > Subject:      RE: manifesto
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:26:48 -0800
> > >
> > > I enjoyed reading your amendments.  Yes, lets screw the socialists.
> > > Anil
> > >
> > > Sauvik Chakraverti <sauvikc@yahoo.com> wrote on Thursday January 6,
> > > 2000 at  7:10am:
> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate
> > > it!
> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >i have a few points to add to the party
> > > >constitution/manifesto
> > > >
> > > >1. We are all born with the natural ability to trade:
> > > >what Adam Smith called 'a natural propensity to truck,
> > > >barter and exchange'. Little children gainfully

> > > >exchange toys and food amongst each other. Free trade
> > > >is our birthright.
> > > >
> > > >2. Free trade requires sound money. We believe sound
> > > >money should be a constitutional right.
> > > >
> > > >3. We are secular and we believe the free market to be
> > > >one of the secular foundations of human morality. In
> > > >this connection it is worth mentioning that the Hindus
> > > >first said shubh laabh and the Prophet Muhammad, peace
> > > >be upon him, was a free trader. Both religions can
> > > >happily co-exist in the free market. That would be
> > > >true secularism.
> > > >
> > > >4. We define economics to be a study of the production
> > > >of wealth through the division of labour and
> > > >knowledge. This division is maximum in urban areas
> > > >where dense popoulation causes prosperity. Our urban
> > > >areas are disaster zones while the state misspends
> > > >money on rural development. We see an urban future and
> > > >aspire for an India in which every town and city -
> > > >every dot on the map - every strange name in the STD
> > > >codebook - is a Singapore. That is our vision
> > > >statement.
> > > >
> > > >5. We intend to launch the Indian Liberal Party with
> > > >much fanfare by around march 1st 2000. All those
> > > >willing to join should notify.
> > > >
> > > >6. The party symbol should be a screw. We screw the
> > > >socialists.
> > > >
> > > >let me know your comments
> > > >sauvik
> > > >
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> Yazad Jal
> yazad@ccsindia.org or yazad@usa.net
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
> Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------