[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: apology needed from Mr Vajpayee for betraying his Oath of Office

Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
Mr Vajpayee's statements reflected the will of the people.  He deserves not 
censure but praise and support for his courageous statement.  As a long time 
NRI, I see around me overwhelming support for Mr Vajpayee's statements from 
fellow NRIs.  Case in point -  I frequent another open discussion forum 
which discusses and debates current topics from India.  When Mr Vajpayee's 
statements were posted on the board, it generated a flood of supporting 
comments.  In fact, when all was said and done, there over a 100 messages, 
the vast majority in support of Vajpayee.  This is the same forum where even 
5 comments for a given topic is a stretch, let alone 5 *supporting* 
comments.  To any reasonable person, this little example illustrates the 
broad based, grass roots support that Mr Vajpayee enjoys on this issue.

To chastise him for reflecting the will of the majority goes against the 
very essence of a representative democracy.  It also renders the second 
point moot - it is the majority, as is its right, which is rejecting the 
constitution, not Vajpayee.  The majority can no longer swallow a document 
which institutionalises differences - it would be akin to separate 
constitutions for blacks and whites in USA and would be laughed out of a 
grade 5 classroom here.

Sanjay Garg

>From: prabhu.guptara@ubs.com
>Reply-To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>Subject: apology needed from Mr Vajpayee for betraying his Oath of Office
>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 06:54:34 -0800 (PST)
>Please help make the Manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!
>All Indian organisations and individuals should support the following 
>for an intervention by the President, and for an apology from Mr Vajpayee,
>should urge evryone to stop dealing with Mr Vajpayee as long as he does not
>issue such an apology.
>Whether he can and will dismiss the ministers is entirely a political 
>if there is enough support for the move within and outside India, he will
>to do so, but that, I repeat, is a political matter.
>The apology relates to a matter which has resulted in his betraying the
>Constitution of India which he swore to uphold when he took the office of
>Minister.  Like every other citizen he can follow due process of law in
>to change the Constitution, but if he violates the Constitution or any 
>law, he should suffer the penalty for it.
>Given Indian realities, it is extremely unlikely that he will be impeached
>he should be) but he should be forced at least to offer an apology.
>prabhu guptara
>The All India Babri Masjid Re-building Committee (AIBMRC) demanded a public
>apology from the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, for his
>statement on Ram temple and dismissal of charge-sheeted Union Ministers, L
>K Advani, Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi and Ms. Uma Bharti, in the Babri Masjid
>demolition case. Seeking the President, Mr. K R Narayanan's intervention in
>the matter, the AIBMRC in a letter requested him to refer all the disputes
>of Babri Masjid - Ram Janmabhoomi to the Supreme Court under Article 138-B
>of the Constitution for a final, time bound and binding decision. (HINDU,
>14 Dec.)
>This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
>Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/