[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

EXPUNGED




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>CONFIDENTIAL:   Posting to the Management Team of IndiaPolicy Institute

>Please DO NOT distribute this message.
http://www.indiapolicy.org/office/
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

>SLANDEROUS COMMENTS OF SUBROTO ROY EXPUNGED.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nirvikar Singh <boxjenk@cats.ucsc.edu>
>To: team@indiapolicy.org <team@indiapolicy.org>
>Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 10:14
>Subject: Re: Mr. Sabhlok has no business promoting secession
>
>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>-
>>CONFIDENTIAL:   Posting to the Management Team of IndiaPolicy
Institute
>>Please DO NOT distribute this message.
http://www.indiapolicy.org/office/
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>>Hi Suby:
>>
>>Do you think that any debate (even academic debate) about possible
terms
of
>>secession is treasonous?!
>>
>>Best,
>>Nirvikar
>>
>>
>>At 09:23 AM 3/4/99 +0530, you wrote:
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>--
>>>CONFIDENTIAL:   Posting to the Management Team of IndiaPolicy
Institute
>>>Please DO NOT distribute this message.
http://www.indiapolicy.org/office/
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>-
>>>>I was working on a proposal that would enhance democracy and
rational
>>>>debate in India over issues relating to secession from the country.
The
>>>>following paragraph may be inserted at the appropriate place in the
>>>>manifesto, as a first step to this long-needed debate.
>>>>
>>>>"A group of people interested in seceding from India would need a
>>>>proposal signed by 5% of the adult population of the concerned area
>>>>(usually at least a state) for a referendum to take place. They will
be
>>>>permitted one year of campaigning during which only peaceful methods
and
>>>>debate will be permitted. At the end of the period, if 2/3rd of the
>>>>adult population of the area approves the proposal, the state would
be
>>>>permitted to secede from India. Any use of violence would cancel the

>>>>process."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Please realise that only a duly elected Constituent Assembly of India
is
>>>authorized to talk about the terms of secession.  Mr. Sabhlok has
gone
>>>completely overboard with this.
>>>
>>>Subroto Roy.
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Sanjeev Sabhlok <sabhlok@almaak.usc.edu>
>>>To: debate@indiapolicy.org <debate@indiapolicy.org>
>>>Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 04:56
>>>Subject: secession
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>>Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy
chapters
>>>>are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding.
IPI
>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>-
>>>>This is the National Debate on System Reform.
>debate@indiapolicy.org
>>>>Rules, Procedures, Archives:
>http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Nirvikar Singh
>>Department of Economics
>>Social Sciences 1
>>University of California
>>Santa Cruz, CA 95064
>> Voice      (831) 459-4093
>>Fax           (831) 459-5900
>>Web          http://econ.ucsc.edu/~boxjenk/
>>
>
>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------