[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Critique of Dasgupta's description



---------------------------------------------------------------------
[Topics under debate]: GOOD GOVERNANCE
___Help make this manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!___
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I must have missed the thread. Who is Dasgupta?

Thanks,

Dayal


>From: "Dr. Subroto Roy" <sroy@vgsom.iitkgp.ernet.in>
>Reply-To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>To: debate@indiapolicy.org
>Subject: Critique of Dasgupta's description
>Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 06:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
>From owner-india_policy@cinenet.net Tue Jun 22 07:09:54 1999
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)by tahoe.cinenet.net (8.8.6/8.8.6)
id
>GAA28684for india_policy-list; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 06:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-Id: <199906221347.GAA28684@tahoe.cinenet.net>
>X-Authentication-Warning: tahoe.cinenet.net: majordomo set sender to
>owner-india_policy@cinenet.net using -f
>Sender: owner-india_policy@cinenet.net
>Precedence: bulk
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>[Topics under debate]: GOOD GOVERNANCE
>___Help make this manifesto better, or accept it, and propagate it!___
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  this poisonous insect of a nation
>
>The above is not a civil way for an Indian to describe Pakistan, even
>though
>we may be enemies in war shortly.   It places us at the same level of
>those
>in Pakistan who use similar terms to describe us.    There is good and
>evil
>in Pakistan as there is everywhere else.  The problem at the moment is
>that
>the evil seem to have the upper hand.
>
>Subroto Roy.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------