[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Let us all become uniform!



========================================================
Administrative Note:
-------------------
Week's Agenda: Social Conditions
  Minimum Wage
  Rules regarding Safety of Personnel at work to be made clear
  Introduction of Social Security Net
  Introduction of identity card
  Removal of Age discrimination at work
  Creating conditions so that reservations will no longer be necessary
========================================================

On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Pratap Raju wrote:

> My two bits on UCC.
> There are two options:
> 1] Create a uniform civil code for all Indian residents.
> 2] Allow separate groups to live under their own personal laws.
> 
> Though both issues have their own problems, I believe the lesser of
> the two evils is the first option - UCC. .  There is a fundamental
> inconsistency problem with separate personal laws -- they argue for
> diversity in personal laws, but yet steamroll uniformity within their
> defined groups. 

Let me start the debate as follows: What extent does one want uniformity
in India? Answer my questionnaire:
	
	QUESTION				YES/NO

* Uniformity in the way we brush our teeth	

* Uniformity in the way we comb our hair	

*  ... wear our clothes (remember the blue dress in China durin Mao's
	days? Shall we all start wearing purple saris and red bindis?)

* ... the way we carry out our personal romances (you may not kiss the
	the ears!)

* ... what we eat and the way we eat (let us eat only camels!)

* ... the movies we watch, etc.

* and then:	the laws we have on murder
		the laws we have on torts
		the procedure we follow in our civil procedure ...

Sure: uniformity is important, but ONLY in those areas which impose
negative externalities on me. If you steal somebody else's property, I am
affected seriously since it increases the risk that my property will be
stolen. But if you marry using X, Y or Z method, or divorce using K,L, or
M method, it does not affect me. 

I, for example, have used the Special Marriages Act to officially capture
my wife and to make known to all that may have other intentions: beware!
don't touch this woman! She is officially mine! In olden days, I would
have carried her away with a club on my shoulder. But that is risky in
modern times. All kinds of folks wanting to pounce on this diffused system
of "club marriage."  So, we have official systems - of any type - to
prevent other humans from trying to encroach into our private biological
territory.

Therefore I don't quite care for uniformity of either beliefs or the way
you dress, or the way you marry or divorce, unless I am negatively
affected by it. 

I have never been negatively affected by my friends marrying either as
Christians, Muslims or Hindus. I was neither impoverished nor thrown out
of my house. Nor did anyone yet try to steal my wife, since they are all
scared of the official recognition I have of this lifetime capture of a
mate. 

So: to me the UCC is a dead duck, without any special reasons to motivate
me to propound its cause. If you show me something bad about these diverse
religious laws of marriage that I have missed in my 38 years on this
planet, then I'll reconsider this issue. The only bad thing I found was
corruption, socialism and arrogance to impose one's preferences on others.
That is what I am concerned with.

SS



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a posting to India_Policy Discussion list:  debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------